Cindy Kurleto's Nipple Says Hi!


I'm not sure if what I'm seeing in the photo above is actually Cindy Kurleto's nipple being squeezed in between that shirt and her hand, but all my scientist friends in the Perve Lab are hands-up in attesting they couldn't find any pixel abnormality (one of the tell-tale signs of Photoshop) or any digital cum stain (tell-tale sign of photoshopper gone wank-crazy), except the image is actually low resolution. So I asked our town's Parish priest, who is an expert in cum stains, and he swears by God almighty and may Jesus come down from heaven and shove a crucifix up his ass that by God that's indeed Cindy Kurleto's nipple just peeking there like a nice puppy.

So I rest my case. That's a teat. Let's all give good-lookin' Flesh Asia Daily reader "Party Boy" a 21-gun salute for sending these.


at 5:56 AM  

3 comments:

Anonymous said... October 2, 2007 at 2:24 AM  

i'm an expert in editing pics.. and the verdict is "it's edited.." :p
exp:
1. the pic is small
2. the pic is black and white to hide the manipulation and color mix.
3. and the under part of the boob clearly blurred.

but kudos to the editor..
coz the pic is uncommon and looks candid. ^_^

Anonymous said... October 17, 2007 at 3:21 AM  

Actually, the irregularities in pixels can be found where the face of cindy and the neck of whoever she is was merged. Cindy's face is sharper compared to her neck. They don't even have the same tone in color (face and neck). Your photoshop expert analysts are looking at the wrong places. They must be good only at looking nipples wahahaha! peace.

Anonymous said... October 17, 2007 at 4:08 AM  

you two anonymous dudes are geniuses!

i for one would agree we were so busy looking ONLY at the nipple that we entirely forgot about the face-neck pixel difference.

Post a Comment